BADRA

Ballasalla and District Residents Association
Home
About BADRA
The Village Guardian
Meetings
Malew News
Reciprocal Health Dispute
High Court Report
Committee Members
Malew Commissioners
Neighbourhood Watch
Malew & Santon MHK
Ballasalla School
St Marys School Douglas
Clubs and Activites
The Abbey Church
The View from Clagh Vane
Malew In Pictures
Friends of Ballasalla
Law and Order
Local Information
Archived News Jan to June
Archived News Up to 2009
Can you Help?
Planning Applications
Refuse Collections, Recycling, and Incineration
Links
Donations
Airport Development
Heritage Homes
Bottom Ash to Turkeylands
Crossag Farm
Poachers Pocket
Offical BADRA Statement
Contact Us
Site Map
Southern Plan
BADRAS STATEMENT WITH REGARD TO THE HIGH COURT PETITION OF J.G.KELLY LTD AND JACKSON HOMES.
 
After much deliberation and soul searching it has been decided that Ballasalla and District Residents Association (BADRA) will not be taking an active part in the above petition being held in the High Court in Douglas Isle of Man.

This as people know is the continuing planning application by DOLGE to build 257 homes on Crossag Ballasalla.

On the 28th May 2008 a letter from our Advocates (solicitors) was sent to the Clerk to His Honour Deemster Kerruish stating our reasons why we had decided on this position. We stated in the letter our opposition to the Petition and our support in the position taken by the Council of Ministers.
We also explained that we had decided to take this action because of cost consequences of these proceedings.

We wish to add, for the attention of our members that this decision was not taken lightly. Having attended Court at every hearing so far, in our opinion this stage of the whole saga has now moved on from planning requirements to the legality of decisions made or not made.

Also in the light of the decision to participate in the proceedings by Malew Commissioners, had we remained it would have meant duplication of evidence.
We have therefore decided to throw ourselves whole heartedly behind the stance taken by the Commissioners and offer our assistance if required.
 
We would also like to point out that the cost of our participation, as estimated by our Advocate, was frightening and, as no doubt after this petition is concluded there will be another planning application, we felt that we should keep our finances available for that.

We shall however be attending the High Court and will be keeping an eye on the continuing proceedings.

We would like to point out that as things stand at the moment, due to the extreme costs of legal proceedings, Inquiries etc, involved with planning decisions, and the fact that there is no assistance from any direction towards costs, the whole system is weighted towards large companies, government departments, and individuals with unlimited funds, therefore excluding the ordinary member of the public from pursuing their legal rights through the system.