BADRA

Ballasalla and District Residents Association
Home
About BADRA
The Village Guardian
Meetings
Malew News
Reciprocal Health Dispute
High Court Report
Committee Members
Malew Commissioners
Neighbourhood Watch
Malew & Santon MHK
Ballasalla School
St Marys School Douglas
Clubs and Activites
The Abbey Church
The View from Clagh Vane
Malew In Pictures
Friends of Ballasalla
Law and Order
Local Information
Archived News Jan to June
Archived News Up to 2009
Can you Help?
Planning Applications
Refuse Collections, Recycling, and Incineration
Links
Donations
Airport Development
Heritage Homes
Bottom Ash to Turkeylands
Crossag Farm
Poachers Pocket
Tynwald Backs Plans
MHK Latest
Director acted 'unwisely'
Housing Row Talks
Select Committee
Report delayed
Offical BADRA Statement
Contact Us
Site Map
Southern Plan
Planning director acted 'unwisely' over Ballasalla estate
 
 
PLANNING director Ian McCauley acted 'unwisely' and made an 'error of judgement' in his handling of a housing development in Ballasalla, a Tynwald select committee has concluded.

The committee, which will report to Tynwald this week, was set up to investigate the handling of an application (02/0712) by Ravenhill Resources Ltd to build 22 homes at Poacher's Pocket.

Planning consent was granted and upheld on appeal, but objectors claimed subsequent amendments to the scheme constituted a new application which they believed should have been dealt with afresh by the planning committee.

The changes included the felling of 50 trees on the site, amended flood protection measures and the raising of the level of the whole site.

Instead, the DLGE's planning boss used his delegated powers to approve major changes to the scheme without advertising those amendments or refer them to the planning committee – prompting the objectors to claim they were denied the opportunity to have their case hard formally.

Now the select committee has concluded that Mr McCauley acted lawfully in using his delegated powers but should have referred the matter back to the planning committee.

The committee's report states: 'We conclude that he acted lawfully but in an unwise manner and made an error judgement. The number of objections relating to this planning development made it a highly contentious matter, and one upon which the planning committee should have taken the decision.'

It adds: 'We do not wish to suggest that the director acted unfairly or was biased towards any party but to refer the matter back to the planning committee would have removed any perception of there being any unfairness or bias.'

The report makes it clear that the committee does not have the power to reverse or amend the planning approval and it was not in its remit to comment on the merits or otherwise of the developer's plans.

A series of recommendations are outlined in the committee's report which an independent review of the planning process, currently under way, is urged to consider.
 
*As printed in Isle Of Man Examiner 11th April 2008